MJF Texturing: Improving 3D Printing with Aesthetics and Function

MJF Texturing: Improving 3D Printing with Aesthetics and Function

Apple was one of the companies that put the aesthetics of its products on an equal plane with the functionality of its products. When they were competing for market share in the 90s and 2000s, iconic design and a better user experience helped establish them as one of the most important companies in the world. Successful products focus on both sides of the human experience, utility and beauty. Apple set the bar that most products follow today: function alongside aesthetics.

3D printing provides the opportunity to create highly aesthetic and functional parts without high up-front costs. Designers can use software tools to combine aesthetic textures with basic design principles and advanced DfAM techniques that improve the business case. A textured 3D printed part costs no more to print than an untextured part, but delivers more overall value to the end user. Today, one of the most common textures is to mimic the noise surface of injection molded parts. In traditional manufacturing, this would require expensive etching techniques, but for 3D printing, the noise texture helps disguise the fact that it is 3D printed and makes the whole part feel more valuable.

Textures for automotive 3D printed parts. Source: HP

In addition to these downstream benefits, new tools such as HP’s texture visualization tool are making the upstream process of designing and customizing textures as easy as placing an order on the Internet. By lowering the design barrier and continually improving the output quality of 3D printed parts, texturing is gaining traction. It is still an underutilized tool, so companies like yours that bring 3D-printed, textured products into use can gain market share through innovation and functionality.

This article will review how (1) software tools are making textures more accessible, how to best use (2) aesthetic and (3) functional textures during the design phase, and (4) how post-processing textures further enhances 3D printed parts.

Software Tools for Adding Textures to 3D Printed Parts

The video game industry’s innovation in quickly rendering complex color and texture shapes on screen has directly benefited the addition of textures to 3D printed parts. The CPU/GPU chips that render those complex forms can be used to quickly review textures for printing. 3D printer manufacturers have taken note and begun building processing units into their hardware to work with these native files and avoid exporting 1+ GB .stl files. Next-generation designs that used to take hours to prepare for production can be realized in minutes, further opening the door to the broad adoption of textures.

HP’s texturing tool. Source: HP

There are a variety of tools available for designing and generating textures. We have already mentioned free tools such as HP’s Texture Library and Viewer, which contain pre-validated textures ready to be applied to your Multi Jet Fusion parts. If you are working with a contract manufacturer, they will have the expertise to apply textures to parts quickly and accurately. One of the other most common free tools is Blender, an open-source tool designed for high-end animation output that can draw on databases of open source textures for parts. Experts can also set up special scripts in Blender so that common texture types can be repeated on all parts being produced. Most professional CAD solutions now offer texture mapping for 3D models. Examples include AutoCAD, 3DS Max, Siemens NX, or Dassault Systems. Many 3D printing-specific design tools have been developed to add textures using new rendering methods, such as with Materialise Magics or nTopology, or in some cases tools have been developed for specific technologies such as the Carbon Design Engine or Formlabs Texture Engine but can also be used for the textures on MJF parts.

These tools are becoming increasingly sophisticated, allowing near-seamless surfaces. In the past, small inconsistencies in the surface caused by mismatched faces would leave scars in the texture. Now they are automatically corrected by these tools. Improvements in computer graphics have also improved so that you can adjust texture parameters and instantly see the results on screen. The last historical problem was the large file size of textured surfaces (or mesh structures) that were exported in the .stl file format. Now, 3D printers are increasingly working with native file formats, which saves significant processing time. Newer file formats, such as .3mf, are also contributing to more efficient workflows. For engineers who aren’t familiar with texturing or don’t want to invest the time to learn, working with an experienced production partner is an excellent alternative.

Sample textures within HP’s texture library. Source: HP

Best Practices for Texturing 3D Data

Quality in, quality out. Good information and data at the beginning of a process lead to better quality later in the chain. Working with textures follows the same rule. The tools for applying textures continue to improve, but they are only as good as the surfaces in the original 3D file. If the transitions are smooth and there are no artificial breaks in the surface, the resulting surface textures will be of the highest possible quality. While some of the top tools are starting to overcome irregularities in the 3D files, having a clean surface design with joined faces is the best practice.

MJF 3D printed bicycle grip with texture. Source: HP

Here is a short list of areas to check your existing data before applying textures.

Data Preparation

  • Prepare Clean Surfaces: Make sure there are no stray edges, such as from merging with other geometries, that create irregularities on the surfaces of the design.
  • Join Textured Surfaces: When possible, areas that will have the same texture in the final design should be grouped so that a single selection will include all areas. This is more difficult to do in the texturing tool than in the original design software.
  • Use Balanced Mesh Density: The correct resolution for surfaces, which is determined by the density of the mesh, plays a role in creating well-balanced textures without overburdening the system with large files.

Coordinating with Production

  • Consider Print Orientation: The best print resolution is on the X-Y plane, so the most visually or functionally important surfaces should be oriented in that direction.
  • Account for Material Effects: PA12 and PA11 will show the best and most consistent texturing. PP and TPU are softer and will lose texture detail. If you are using the same texture on multiple materials, you will need to adjust the parameters.
  • Plan for Post-Processing: As described later, chemical smoothing or painting and surface coating will override the texture, so it may require more pronounced depth in the initial design and production.
  • Pay Attention to Texturing Around Edges: Due to differences in production based on print orientation, textures that wrap edges may look inconsistent between the X-Y and Z planes, so it may be necessary to tilt the part or work with two different texture patterns.

MJF 3D printing textures. Source: HP

Enhancing Aesthetics with 3D Printed Textures

People are sensitive to the tactile and visual appeal of the things around them. It has become a symbol of product quality when the objects we use are refined with clean design and attention to detail. Since the strongest 3D printing business cases serve these high-end niches, 3D printed products must have that design reflected in the final part.

The most common use of texturing is to add a noise texture to the surface of a 3D printed part. Since these noise textures are generally associated with the more expensive etching of injection molds, there is an automatic association by users that these parts are of higher quality. It is an association that has been made over decades and represents a “quick win” for MJF parts. The noise texture has a secondary purpose of helping to hide the tell-tale signs of 3D printing ( layers of new powder being applied during printing). When 3D printed parts are first introduced into a corporate environment or product line, there is still a perception that the performance will not match that of conventionally manufactured parts. By adding a texture to mask the source of the part, users will judge the part based on whether it meets a specific need – not based on the manufacturing process.

A variety of different HP 3D printing textures. Source: HP

The next level is matching more complex surfacing on high-value plastic parts, such as designs on automotive parts or leather texture on TPU parts. This is particularly important in the production of replacement parts, where a 3D printed part is placed next to a conventionally manufactured version of the same part. While it takes a bit more time upfront to create a visual match, it improves the overall value of the part in the system where it is used and may even be a requirement for approval of the part.
Aesthetic design can also be a unique selling point and visual differentiator for new 3D printed products. In injection molding, adding textures through chemical or laser etching is costly. Increasing complexity dramatically increases cost, requires significant time, and can only be created once per mold before it is “etched in stone”. 3D printed textures, on the other hand, can be as complex as desired (as long as basic design rules are followed), can be applied more or less instantly once a computer script is programmed, and can be changed on a per-part basis if desired. This opens the door for designers to create very unique visual products that stand out in the marketplace. As the software tools improve, more and more of this
potential is being exploited. The shapes on the surface, from angular modern cuts to rounded, flowing organic structures, are influencing the visual appeal and in turn the adoption of 3D printed parts.

From a commercial standpoint, textures can also be added to a white label part design, to be sold as a value-add by varying the look of the texture for each customer. Even within a single print job, the split between different logos and textures can be adjusted to match sales in a 1:1 ratio – truly lean manufacturing.

3D printing can be used to quickly iterate textured surfaces for new products, even if they will eventually be injection molded. The ability to test different grains, shapes or visual designs in quick succession at low cost can be a key part of new product development. Depending on the complexity of the part and the extent of texturing, these costs can be reduced by a factor of 5-50. The ability to have usable parts with different designs for user testing is a very valuable method to validate new products.

How 3D Printed Textures Enhance Performance

The low-cost, low-effort textures that are added to 3D printed parts can also provide direct performance improvements. The first application is texturing 3D parts to improve grip where they interact in the system with people or with other components. Examples of these types of parts include bumpers for medical devices that don’t want to slide across a lab table, or an elastic cover (in TPU) that acts as a protective layer under a custom prosthetic leg. Adding texture to the foot provides more resistance to keep the medical device in place, and the leg cover stays in place better during sports or activities where the patient’s body sweats.

Other benefits of using textures to improve grip include adding “grit” to gears or rollers that have belts running around them. A light texture will improve the grip of the belt, even as it wears and smooths over time. Another key area where textures can play a key role in performance is for automation grippers. Using different textures and topical shapes can improve the accuracy and repeatability of the process. Since automation is all about repeating a single motion over and over again, reducing errors and improving efficiency have a direct impact on improving the overall business case.

The exact amount of texture performance improvement is difficult to predict in advance, so it is best to test several different options to get the right performance in the end. 3D printing, with its ability to produce and thus test multiple designs without increasing costs, is a perfect medium for iteratively optimizing performance. The approach directly mimics the process we described for assembly consolidation, which also streamlines processes in ways that are difficult to simulate in advance.

Complex duct 3D printed with MJF 3D printing and PA 12. Source: HP

The durability of 3D printed parts is the second functional improvement of texturing. By applying a texture to the surface of a 3D printed part, it adds more irregularity to the surface during printing. This means that the laser will follow these additional contours during production. In this way, it helps to avoid the distinct layer lines, which tend to be the weakest bond point in MJF production. The additional fusion of those complex surfaces also provides a more secure finish.

Surface textures can also be important for air and material flow systems. Depending on the desired application, ridges or embossed shapes that add chaos to a system can help reduce the speed of air coming in from an external source, or stir two liquids together in a chamber by introducing irregularities into the flow. At the other extreme, it may be important to have very smooth surfaces in other areas of the design to increase speed using chemical smoothing (described below). Although it falls between design and texture, having perforated areas within a design is another important use case to allow air or sound to pass through certain regions of a part. All of this can be done with little investment of time and money using advanced design tools and 3D printing.

Post Processing for Stunning Textures

Consumers expect smooth parts. Injection-molded surfaces have been a sign of quality for decades, so a matte 3D-printed part is met with a degree of skepticism, even if it delivers the same performance. The solution is to use chemical smoothing to produce 3D-printed parts with smooth surfaces. To the untrained eye, they are indistinguishable from conventional parts.

By producing textures that are smoothed with chemical polishing, the consumer perceives it as a high-quality part. This helps justify the final business case. Since 3D printing tends to be more expensive per part, aiming to replace or compete with high-value components is a recipe for success.

The chemical smoothing process for additive manufacturing is a much younger technology than the more than 30 years of 3D printing. It involves hanging the part in a closed chamber and pumping an aggressive gas around it. This causes the surface to melt slightly and it can then solidify. Similar to applying a decal to a car or wall with a hair dryer, the hills and valleys on the part’s surface are evened out. The resulting part is not only smoother, but also more air and watertight.

Varying levels of texturing and post processing on glasses

The efficiency of chemical smoothing is increasing and the cost is decreasing. In the past few years, the two leading companies, AMT and DyeMansion, have announced non-toxic green solvents for processing most materials. This is a big win for the environment, as the previous aggressive chemicals were real environmental toxins. But the switch is also a big win for business, as it reduces costs by eliminating the need to transport chemicals as hazardous materials or dispose of them as hazardous waste after use. Because chemical smoothing equipment is a significant investment, this finishing process is an excellent opportunity to work with a contract manufacturer who is familiar with creating these stunning parts.

In the Multi Jet Fusion process, standard PA12 and PA11 materials are an anthracite gray after production. Chemical smoothing results in a rich black color, as expected from standard plastic parts. Especially when working with textures, chemical smoothing transforms the surface from matte to glossy, bringing out the texture more clearly to the eye. The same is true for white parts made with the latest HP PA12 material, which can remain white or be dyed to any color required for the application. When chemically smoothed, standard parts are much more visually appealing and meet the “consumer expectation” for high-end components.

PA 12 White Medical Helmet. Source: Invent Medical

The other main method is to enhance 3D printed textures by painting or coating the parts. The result is similar to smoothing, as the painting or coating helps to seal the pores of the surface, allowing the eye to better perceive the texture of the parts. In most cases, textures applied under a painted topcoat need to be more pronounced (more depth) because the paint fills in the gaps more than chemical smoothing. For end-use parts, it is generally best to work with a few smaller test parts at different depths to finalize the texture design before making the full production batch. Again, one of the great advantages of 3D printing is that you can create a variety of options in a single print run to test and finalize the design.

Painting or coating parts instead of chemically smoothing them tends to make them more resistant to chemicals and especially UV for outdoor applications. This is one of the most common reasons for painting, as long-term outdoor use can wear parts down quickly. After finishing and painting, 3D-printed parts can be used in machines and vehicles all year long in standard weather conditions.

Flexible 3D printed parts can also be coated and colored with BASF Forward AM’s Ultracur3D® Coat F. This two-component topcoat provides additional protection to the part. At the same time, it enhances the visual texture, either with a smooth coating or by bringing out designer textures. For consumer products, this is an important way to achieve consistent color on durable parts with minimal effort.

Source: Forward AM

Textures Bring Wider Use of 3D Printed Parts

Over the past five to ten years, advances in design software, surface improvements for 3D printed parts, and new post-processing methods have allowed 3D printed parts to compete head-to-head with conventionally manufactured products. While additive manufactured parts generally have a higher unit cost, they can have much more complex surfaces and unique textures due to the design freedom offered by the manufacturing technology. When it comes to capturing markets with high-value components, using textures effectively increases the likelihood of success.

Functional textures are often an overlooked, but valuable, way to improve part performance. This can be as simple as adding “grit” to increase friction between parts or as complex as creating mixing behavior for powders or liquids with irregular surfaces. Applying textures to 3D printed parts is getting easier so now is the time to take advantage of the opportunity. A trusted manufacturing service or your in-house CAD design team can add the textures that make parts more visually appealing and functional. This improves the business case, accelerates public acceptance and ultimately ensures that your 3D-printed products find the wider audience and use you are looking for.

Share this post